Talk the Talk 话话世界

华人寄居论已经成为几周热门课题， 主角阿末坚持不道歉， 副首相出面代表道歉，首相表示接受解释，前首相跳出来声援， 槟州巫统坚持阿末无罪，更牵扯民政党老大下水，强逼他道歉。各个华人政党老大开始表达不满。 这是一场原则声明又或是另一个政治演戏？一一可能性为你剖解...

    首先，阿末的确表达了言语被扭曲， 只是说华人祖先以前是寄居者， 他更指出报导这个新闻的记者有个人意图扭曲她的话，之后确定是一位星洲日报女记者，采访经验丰富。 她本人和星洲日报强调据实报导，所以这是产生了2个可能性。

1. 阿末的确没有那个意思？是记者扭曲他的意思，那么记者到底为什么要这样做？为什么阿末一直咬着他多年战友郭博士不放？难道那份报纸是华人政党控制的？各大党选要到， 所以给个机会这些老大发挥意见，争取选票？

2. 阿末的确说过那番话？   不然，堂堂副首相怎么会道歉？ 建议阿末如果再不能忍受被诬赖，可以考虑到回教堂宣誓。

无论哪一个可能都不是好东西。一，如果新闻媒体沦为政党报章，那么有什么新闻自由与中立态度而言，对民主制度带来另一波冲击。2， 如果这是马来同胞的意见，岂不是我们一向来霸占了人家的东西？

3大种族一直是我国特殊的地方，也成为旅游业一个吸引人的地方， 如果这个特点不再是优点，而成了缺点， 是不是证明我国退步了？

难道过了50 年，在这里扎根了的华裔与印裔都还不是公民吗？土著定义真的只看肤色吗？的确能明白当你可以省下10% 的买屋子和车的钱，可以轻易进大学， 可以享有保障和津贴时，你决不会轻易和别人分享。当有必要把我们的公民权也剥夺吗？我们没有贡献吗？发展城市计划有多少个 不是华人 想出来，让其它人“共同”发展？Sunway, Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, Penang, Muar even Petaling. 必须让人在抽comission, 然后再share project. 所以有钱分时候就sama-sama. 没有的时候就是penumpang.是这样吗？

冻结党籍能帮助改变想法吗？华裔领袖不能只是要一句道歉。这是原则问题，到底这类想法存在吗？是一个人，十个人，一个州又或全部。 这个问题如果没有答案，恐怕日后更多这类言论陆续登场。华裔领袖不能只是威胁退出啊... 别人都说：“你早走就好啦。我三月的时候就不会输到这样惨。”问题不是说你走就能解决。

这个问题能不能解决很大决定了国家的未来，another Thailand? 9月16日想要变天？变天能解决这个问题吗？一个野心大的人成了人民或者说是大幅分的非巫裔的希望。但他又这个能力吗？让70% 的人放弃土著特权？如果不能，维持了原来的局面，华人就会觉得被骗，有另一场风波再现。

 

Change... We need it because we want a better condition. How many
YB will join the PKR because of they want a change? We know it clearly. Politician
wouldn't do things for free. Even they drive to parliament, they got subsidies.
So do we agree this type of "trade" for a change? Who is going to
make sure that this gamble is on the right person on the right time? Can he to
be Thaksin of Malaysia version? Give Malaysia a sudden boost on economy. But
don't forget we are more complex. We have to settle racial problem. Obama might
be a big gamble for US people but Mr A seems to be bigger gamble for us. 



Politician? They just fool us around. If the 2008/2009 Rancangan Malaysia was
little sweets for us. Then the promise of decrease fuel price after 916
will be the same. This is the theory. Who give the bigger sweet and hide the
bigger whole win the game. We just want a better government. But no one will be
the best so a opposition party will always needed, but may the new government
kind enough to keep the opposition alive? I can't give you an answer.



In short, I　conclude



１．　We shouldn't know the truth behind Mr A. Ismail’s case. No matter
what it was, it makes us disappoint. 

2. I'll place a bet on Mr A and try whether it's a better Malaysia under
him.

3. 916? Personally I hope Mr M migrates as soon as possible. (I hope you know what
it means) About the principle I said (say no to secret trade?); sometimes best
rules will be no rule at all. 





Above words, contents and anything was written by an underage teenager who may
not have a mature way of thinking. At the same time, this article does not mean
to rise up any racial or political issue. It just a practice for how to write a
better essay in SPM. And the author does not bare any responsibilities if this
article caused any physical hurt or mental stress for any one. Lastly, author
does not agree on forward, cut or copy of this article.

Copy Rights Reserved.